Quote:
Originally Posted by P1et
I currently have a 70-200mm f4, but have the opportunity to buy a 70-200mm f/2.8 IS USM for $900. It supposedly is in very good condition. However, it's a Version I. Is it a good deal for a V1? And is the V2 worth the extra coin?
|
Go to DxOMark.com to compare the IQ. The Series II is better, but only you can judge if it's worth the extra money for you.
The f/4 is a stupendous lens. The question is, do you need f/2.8 and is it worth the extra weight and bulk? If you shoot a ton in low light, with no flash and you can't stand the noise of ultra-high ISOs, then you should get the f/2.8. For someone, like me, carrying two bodies, two lenses on the bodies and three lenses on my back, it's not worth the extra weight.
Are you unhappy with your f/4? If not, then you've simply got GAS, brought on by a killer price and you'll get over it. If you've got issues, what are they?
I've sold all my Series I lenses and all the buyers are very happy.