View Single Post
      02-09-2016, 04:14 PM   #29
MKSixer
Lieutenant General
MKSixer's Avatar
34185
Rep
11,637
Posts

Drives: 2015 BMW i8, E63 M6, 328d
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Southeast United States

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 M4 GTS (Allotted)  [0.00]
2013 BMW 328d  [0.00]
2007 BMW M6  [10.00]
2015 BMW i8  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwzimm View Post
Oh I realize my opinion is not a popular one. Those that don't like it are advised to ignore it.

It just irritates me when people think that they can simply ignore a law. It relates a sense of entitlement and arrogance that is unacceptable. If you don't like a law, then work to change it. I don't go around shooting people who annoy me in the head because I disagree with the laws against murder. Similar concept.
Former lobbyist.
Please remember that there such things as bad law, too much law, and incenting/penalizing the wrong behavior with the law.

The EPA, in this case, is not interested in improving the environment with this new regulatory/enforcement scheme. They are interested in a money grab (fines) and an increase in relevance which will lead to more power.

Agricultural pollutants are a more serious and relevant issue. This should be their focus.

Cheers-mk

Last edited by MKSixer; 02-09-2016 at 05:29 PM..
Appreciate 3