Quote:
Originally Posted by dsad1
Because everyone gets offended when you compare anyone to Jordan, he was the best, but he wasn't far and beyond better than everyone else. If you put them on a numbered scale from 0-100, Jordan might be 100, but there are players that are 99,98,and 97.
Most people see that scale as Jordan is 100 and the closest player to him is 75.
|
Do I really need to list Jordan's accolades out to prove how dominant he was?
I'll start with 6/6 in the NBA Finals, and a massive list of hall of famers who never won thanks to him.