Quote:
Originally Posted by tony20009
Thank you.
Okay. Point me to something that shows I'm wrong.
The things I have read on the topic are:
- Wells Report -- Cites that Mr. Brady didn't deliver phone information that was requested.
- NFL Appeal Decision (https://nfllabor.files.wordpress.com...ady-appeal.pdf) -- Plainly states Mr. Brady did not provide the requested phone content that was requested. The decision states that phone records from the cell phone carrier were provided, but it doesn't say that those records include the content of relevant text messages and/or emails.
- Various news articles:
Now from what I've read, not one source said "Tom Brady turned over the phone information that was requested," or something to that effect. I do see even Mr. Brady's advocate discussing why Mr. Brady did not turn over the requested information. Now you tell me why an attorney/agent would discuss reasons for Mr. Brady's not releasing specific information if instead Mr. Brady did release that information.
All the best. |
You need to read Judge Berman's ruling if you really think Brady was treated fairly in this whole thing. Also, you need to go back and start at the beginning where the NFL leaked info that 11/12 balls were "significantly below the NFLs requirements" when that wasn't true and then when the NFL leaked that Brady destroyed his phone. They have been trying to set the narrative to get people who just don't understand to think this is Black and white and Brady is without a doubt a cheater.
The article you referenced from deadspin mentions that he turned over phone records and only 3 text messages after the super bowl between Brady and the equipment guy are missing.
And i have included a snippet from this article below. The NFL, despite looking for the "truth", couldn't be bothered by this, but they were fine with spending months and millions on the "independent" Wells Report that their own guy supervised Wells during?
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...text-messages/
Specifically, it can be found at footnote 11 on page 12: “After the hearing and after the submission of post-hearing briefs, Mr. Brady’s certified agents offered to provide a spreadsheet that would identify all of the individuals with whom Mr. Brady had exchanged text messages during [the relevant time] period; the agents suggested that the League could contact those individuals and request production of any relevant text messages that they retained. Aside from the fact that, under Article 46, Section 2(f) of the CBA, such information could and should have been provided long before the hearing, the approach suggested in the agents’ letter — which would require tracking down numerous individuals and seeking consent from each to retrieve from their cellphones detailed information about their text message communications during the relevant period — is simply not practical.”